T004 $\mathcal{B}(t\to u\gamma)$
Flavor-changing neutral-current top decay t $ \to $ u $\gamma$ Status REVIEWED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Low
PDG / equivalent values
| Observable | Value | Year | Experiment / source | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B(t $ \to \gamma$ q), q = u,c | < 9.5e-6 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2026 | Particle Data Group pdgLive t-quark listing | source ↑ |
| B(t $ \to $ u $\gamma$), left-handed tqgamma benchmark | < 0.85e-5 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2023 | ATLAS arXiv:2205.02537v3 | source ↑ |
| B(t $ \to $ u $\gamma$), right-handed tqgamma benchmark | < 1.2e-5 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2023 | ATLAS arXiv:2205.02537v3 | source ↑ |
| B(t $ \to $ u $\gamma$), single nonzero coupling at a time | < 0.95e-5 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2024 | CMS-TOP-21-013 public result page | source ↑ |
Why this constrains the RS scan
In warped or partially composite flavor models, non-universal fermion profiles
and mass-basis rotations can induce top FCNC couplings. The photon channel is
a dipole-like probe, complementary to \(t\to uZ\), \(t\to ug\), and \(t\to uh\).
Compared with charm final states, T004 isolates the top-up flavor rotation and
therefore probes a different corner of the anarchic up-sector structure.
What's changed since the original paper
The comparison baseline is arXiv:0804.1954
(
CFW2008:T004:rs\_flavor\_context). Since that reference epoch,
the important change is experimental: ATLAS and CMS set direct mode-resolved
limits (ATLAS2023:T004:dataset; CMS2024:T004:dataset). The
high-energy single-production strategy also became a standard way to discuss
future sensitivity for \(t\to uZ/u\gamma\)-equivalent interactions.Validity and model dependence
Experimentally this is a clean null-search upper limit; the SM rate is far
below current reach and is lower than the corresponding \(t\to c\gamma\) rate
because of CKM suppression
(
AguilarSaavedra2017:T004:SM\_and\_projection\_context). The
interpretation is not model-independent: ATLAS quotes separate chiral
\(tq\gamma\) tensor benchmarks, and an RS backend must choose an operator
normalization before comparing scan points to the branching-fraction limit.Code coverage in this repo
Coverage is NO. The author reran the required catalog greps across
quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/,
neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/,
scanParams/, and tests/. The targeted \(t\to u\gamma\),
\(tu\gamma\), \(tq\gamma\), and top-photon FCNC search returned no observable,
Wilson coefficient, or branching-ratio implementation.
Linked evidence (opens GitHub blob at flavor-catalog-website/2026q2):
- Required plan greps rerun on 2026-05-16 across quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/, neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/, scanParams/, and tests/.
- The implemented hits are the existing neutral-meson Delta F = 2 and mu -> e gamma paths; no top FCNC photon observable, tqgamma Wilson coefficient, or t -> u gamma branching-ratio check was found.
- Targeted grep for t -> u gamma / tu gamma / tq gamma / top-photon FCNC returned no matches in the inspected code paths.
Implementation difficulty
Implementation difficulty is HIGH. The repo has no top-FCNC photon
dipole basis, no RS-to-\(tu\gamma\) matching convention, and no top radiative
decay-width or production-recast module. A production backend would need those
ingredients before this limit could become a scan cut.
Reason: Cataloging the limit is straightforward, but production integration needs a new electroweak dipole/top-FCNC operator convention, RS-to-top-flavor matching for t-u rotations, and a $t \to u \gamma$ decay-width or production/decay recast path not present in the current $\Delta F = 2$ and $\mu \to e \gamma$ code.
Key references
PDG2026TopTGammaQ; ATLAS2023TopFCNCTQGamma;
CMS2024TopFCNCTQGamma; CsakiFalkowskiWeiler2008WarpedFlavor;
AguilarSaavedra2017UltraBoostedTopFCN.