T001 $\mathcal{B}(t\to cZ)$
Flavor-changing neutral-current top decay t $ \to $ c Z Status SUBTLETY-ADDED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Low
PDG / equivalent values
| Observable | Value | Year | Experiment / source | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B(t $ \to $ Z c), left-handed t-c-Z benchmark | < 1.3e-4 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2025 | PDG2025:T001:tZc_left | source ↑ |
| B(t $ \to $ Z c), right-handed t-c-Z benchmark | < 1.2e-4 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2025 | PDG2025:T001:tZc_right | source ↑ |
| ATLAS2023:T001:dataset | 139 fb^-1 at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV integrated luminosity and collision energy | 2023 | ATLAS2023:T001:dataset | source ↑ |
| $ATLAS2023:T001:tZc_{left}$ | < 13e-5 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2023 | ATLAS2023:T001:tZc_left | source ↑ |
| $ATLAS2023:T001:tZc_{right}$ | < 12e-5 branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2023 | ATLAS2023:T001:tZc_right | source ↑ |
| CMS2017:T001:dataset | 19.7 fb^-1 at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV integrated luminosity and collision energy | 2017 | CMS2017:T001:dataset | source ↑ |
| CMS2017:T001:tZc | < 0.049% branching fraction, 95% CL upper limit | 2017 | CMS2017:T001:tZc | source ↑ |
| AguilarSaavedra2004:T001:SM | 1e-14 Standard Model branching-fraction estimate | 2004 | AguilarSaavedra2004:T001:SM | source ↑ |
| PDG2025:T001:SM | order 1e-14 Standard Model branching-fraction estimate | 2025 | PDG2025:T001:SM | source ↑ |
| $AirenFranceschini2026:T001:HL_{LHC}_{projection}$ | approximately 1e-6 $projected equivalent BR(t \to c Z) reach$ | 2026 | AirenFranceschini2026:T001:HL_LHC_projection | source ↑ |
Why this constrains the RS scan
In warped or partially composite flavor models, non-universal fermion profiles
and mass-basis rotations can produce flavor off-diagonal neutral-current
couplings. The \(t\to cZ\) channel is especially diagnostic of the top sector:
it probes the \(t\)-\(c\) rotation and the degree of right-handed top
compositeness more directly than light-meson \(\Delta F=2\) observables. A
direct top FCNC limit is therefore complementary to the existing kaon, \(B\),
and \(D\)-mixing lane rather than a substitute for it.
What's changed since the original paper
The CFW-era reference point is arXiv:0804.1954, which framed warped flavor
constraints before the full LHC top-FCNC program. Since then, the key
experimental change is the move from Tevatron and early-LHC inclusive \(t\to
Zq\) limits to flavor-separated LHC constraints. CMS used
\(19.7~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}\) at \(\sqrt{s}=8~\mathrm{TeV}\)
(
CMS2017:T001:dataset) and found
\(\mathcal{B}(t\to Zc)<0.049\%\) (CMS2017:T001:tZc). ATLAS later used
\(139~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}\) at \(\sqrt{s}=13~\mathrm{TeV}\)
(ATLAS2023:T001:dataset), combining single-top \(tZ\) production and
\(t\bar t\) FCNC-decay topologies, and improved the \(t\to Zc\) reach to the
\(10^{-4}\) level (ATLAS2023:T001:tZc\_left,
ATLAS2023:T001:tZc\_right). A 2026 RS-specific study,
arXiv:2601.14966, recasts post-LHC constraints on \(Ztc\) and notes that
HL-LHC direct searches may reach an equivalent \(\mathcal{B}(t\to cZ)\) level
of about \(10^{-6}\) (AirenFranceschini2026:T001:HL\_LHC\_projection).Validity and model dependence
Experimentally this is a clean upper limit; there is no SM-sized background
from true \(t\to cZ\) decays. The SM branching estimate is about \(10^{-14}\),
so any observed signal would be unambiguous new physics
(
AguilarSaavedra2004:T001:SM; PDG2025:T001:SM). The
interpretation is not fully model independent: ATLAS quotes separate left- and
right-handed tensor-SMEFT benchmarks, while an RS model may generate vector-like
\(Ztc\) couplings, heavy-vector exchange, or correlated contact interactions.
A scan backend would need to map the RS parameters into a chosen operator
convention before applying the PDG-number as a hard cut.
In down-aligned or kaon-protected RS variants, top FCNCs become leading rather
than secondary diagnostics.Code coverage in this repo
Coverage is NO. The author reran the required plan greps and a targeted
search for \(t\to cZ\), \(tZc\), \(tcZ\), and generic FCNC text across
quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/,
neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/,
scanParams/, and tests/. The only non-doc hits were generic
FCNC prose/comments, not an observable, likelihood, or branching-ratio check.
Linked evidence (opens GitHub blob at flavor-catalog-website/2026q2):
Implementation difficulty
The cataloging difficulty is medium, but production integration is HIGH.
The repo has no electroweak top-FCNC operator basis, no \(tcZ\) width or
single-production reinterpretation, and no top-sector flavor-rotation interface.
Implementing it honestly would require a new RS-to-SMEFT or direct \(Ztc\)
matching convention before this limit can be compared to scan points.
Reason: MEDIUM to store the external upper limit, but HIGH for production-grade RS integration because the repo lacks electroweak top-FCNC matching, a tcZ decay-width/production interpretation, and top-sector flavor-rotation plumbing.
Key references
PDG2025TopFCNCTZQ; ATLAS2023TopFCNCTZQ;
CMS2017TZQFCNC; AguilarSaavedra2004TopFCNC;
CsakiFalkowskiWeiler2008WarpedFlavor;
AirenFranceschini2026RSTopFCNC.