CR006 $pp \to W_{KK}^{(1)} \to \ell \nu, tb$
Charged-current high-mass resonance (KK W) Status REVIEWED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Medium
PDG / equivalent values
| Observable | Value | Year | Experiment / source | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $m(W'_{SSM}$) lower bound in pp $ \to $ W' $ \to $ e $\nu$ | > 6.0 TeV 95% CL (lower_limit) | 2025 | ATLAS | source ↑ |
| $m(W'_{SSM}$) lower bound in pp $ \to $ W' $ \to \mu \nu$ | > 5.6 TeV 95% CL (lower_limit) | 2025 | CMS | source ↑ |
| $m(W'_{SSM}$) lower bound in combined pp $ \to $ W' $ \to $ e $\nu$ and $\mu \nu$ | > 5.7 TeV 95% CL (lower_limit) | 2022 | CMS | source ↑ |
| $m(W'_R$) lower bound in pp $ \to $ W' $ \to $ tb, leptonic top final states | > 4.3 TeV 95% CL (lower_limit) | 2024 | CMS | source ↑ |
| $m(W'_L$) lower bound in pp $ \to $ W' $ \to $ tb, leptonic top final states | > 3.9 TeV 95% CL (lower_limit) | 2024 | CMS | source ↑ |
Why this constrains the RS scan
This collider-RS resonance search plays a different role from the low-energy
flavor constraints already in the catalog. The current quark-scan
methodology note quotes the
anarchic-flavor benchmark crossing
\[
M_{\rm KK}^{\min}(p50,\; g_s^\star=3) = 47.26~{\rm TeV},
\]
with a 95\% acceptance crossing at \(127.13\) TeV. Direct LHC searches for
charged high-mass resonances therefore do not lead the constraint hierarchy
in anarchic quark-flavor RS. Instead, CR006 is a cross-check and a handle on
non-anarchic or deliberately lighter custodial-RS spectra where the flavor
bound is weakened, aligned, or not imposed.
The mapping to an RS charged KK gauge boson is model-dependent. The
\(\ell\nu\) limits assume sizable couplings to light quarks and leptons, a
light invisible neutrino final state, and the SSM-like production rate and
branching ratio. A realistic custodial \(W^{(1)}_{\rm KK}\) can have
suppressed light-fermion couplings and enhanced \(tb\), \(WZ\), or \(Wh\)
decays, so the SSM \(\ell\nu\) limit is usually an aggressive proxy rather
than a literal \(M_{\rm KK}\) bound. The \(tb\) searches are closer to the
Agashe-style warped charged-gauge signal, but still require assumptions about
the chiral coupling, total width, production coupling to initial-state light
quarks, and whether the \(tb\) branching fraction is saturated.
What's changed since the original paper
The post-2010 LHC history is a progression from earlier and partial-Run-2
searches to full-Run-2 leptonic and \(tb\) limits.
ATLAS \(\ell\nu\),
arXiv:1906.05609, is the key leptonic milestone:
with 139 fb\(^{-1}\) at 13 TeV it pushed the SSM \(e\nu\) mass exclusion to
6.0 TeV and provided the companion ATLAS \(\mu\nu\) channel bound. CMS \(\ell\nu\),
arXiv:2202.06075, used 138 fb\(^{-1}\) at 13 TeV and excluded a
combined SSM \(W'\) below 5.7 TeV, while PDG records CMS as setting the
strongest \(\mu\nu\)-specific 5.6 TeV limit.
For \(W'\to tb\), ATLAS arXiv:1801.07893 established a boosted
all-hadronic Run-2 analysis with top-jet substructure. ATLAS
arXiv:1807.10473 covered the lepton-plus-jets topology and combined
it with the all-hadronic result, improving the right-handed benchmark reach.
CMS arXiv:2104.04831 updated the all-hadronic channel with full-Run-2
data and deep-learning top/bottom tagging. CMS
arXiv:2310.19893 is the current \(tb\) anchor for this entry: with
138 fb\(^{-1}\), it excludes narrow left- and right-handed \(W'\) bosons below
3.9 and 4.3 TeV, respectively, and also publishes width-dependent limits.Validity and model dependence
The experimental exclusions are robust statements about their stated signal
models. Their RS reinterpretation is not automatic. The leptonic SSM limits
assume SM-like \(W'\) couplings to light quarks and charged leptons, an
ordinary neutrino final state, and a line shape close to the benchmark used in
the transverse-mass search. They lose force in leptophobic or
third-generation-philic RS variants, and they can shift if \(W'\)-SM \(W\)
interference, heavy-neutrino decays, or large total widths are important.
The \(tb\) limits are closer to custodial-RS charged-vector phenomenology, but
they still assume a simplified chiral \(W'\) benchmark and a specified width.
An RS implementation must compute the production coupling to the incoming
partons, the \(tb\), \(WZ\), \(Wh\), and exotic-fermion branching fractions,
and the detector-level acceptance before using these as hard scan cuts.
Code coverage in this repo
NO. Greps over
quarkConstraints/, qcd/,
flavorConstraints/, neutrinos/, yukawa/,
warpConfig/, solvers/, scanParams/, and
tests/ found no \(W'\), \(W_{\rm KK}\), collider resonance,
\(\ell\nu\), or \(tb\) direct-search implementation. The only ATLAS/CMS-like
hit in those paths is tests/test\_alpha\_s.py:88--89, a
CMS/RunDec running-coupling example unrelated to collider limits.
Adjacent evidence confirms that the scan stores \(M_{\rm KK}\) and evaluates
low-energy constraints, not direct LHC searches:
quarkConstraints/scan.py:418--439 writes \(M_{\rm KK}\) and
\(\Delta F=2\) ratios, scanParams/scan.py:524--535 applies only the
\(\mu\to e\gamma\) LFV check, and
quarkConstraints/deltaf2.py:316--560 matches and evaluates
\(\Delta F=2\) Wilson coefficients at \(M_{\rm KK}\).Implementation difficulty
HIGH. A faithful CR006 implementation requires a collider
reinterpretation layer rather than a new scalar observable formula: signal
generation or tabulated production cross sections for the chosen custodial-RS
charged vector, branching-ratio calculation including heavy fermion partners,
finite-width and interference handling, detector acceptance, and a likelihood
or limit recast. A practical implementation would probably call an external
recasting tool such as CheckMATE, MadAnalysis5, SModelS, or collaboration
simplified-likelihood material rather than trying to reproduce the ATLAS/CMS
selection internally.
Reason: Needs a collider reinterpretation workflow: RS charged-vector production and decays, branching fractions to tb/WZ/Wh/exotics, finite-width/interference handling, detector acceptance, and ATLAS/CMS likelihood or recast machinery.
Key references
Process-local source keys before bibliography consolidation are
PDG2025\_WprimeSearches,
ATLAS2019\_WprimeLnu,
CMS2022\_WprimeLnu,
CMS2024\_WprimeTbLeptonic,
CMS2021\_WprimeTbHadronic,
ATLAS2018\_WprimeTbLeptonJets,
ATLAS2018\_WprimeTbHadronic,
Agashe2008\_WarpedChargedGauge, and
AgasheServant2004\_WarpedUnification.