B016 $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$
Exclusive B $ \to $ K $\ell^+ \ell^-$ branching fractions Status REVIEWED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Low
Why this constrains the RS scan
This is a \(\Delta B=1\) flavor-changing neutral-current probe of the same
down-sector flavor structure that appears in \(B_s\) mixing, but it tests
semileptonic and dipole operators rather than four-quark \(\Delta F=2\)
operators. In warped or anarchic-flavor models, flavor-changing \(Z\) or KK
electroweak-gauge couplings and loop dipoles can feed \(C_7\), \(C_9\),
\(C_{10}\), and primed semileptonic coefficients. The branching fractions are
therefore useful diagnostics of \(b\to s\ell\ell\) structure, while the LFU
ratios and \(K^*\) angular program carry related but distinct information.
What's changed since the original paper
Since the arXiv:0804.1954 RS-flavor baseline, source key
CsakiFalkowskiWeiler2008:CompositeFlavor, this channel moved from
sparse \(B\)-factory evidence into precision rare-\(B\) phenomenology. BaBar
provided early post-baseline \(B\to K^{(*)}\ell^+\ell^-\) asymmetry inputs
(BaBar2009:BtoKllAsymmetries). LHCb measured differential
\(B\to K^{(*)}\mu^+\mu^-\) branching fractions and isospin asymmetries with
hadron-collider data (LHCb2014:BtoKmumuDifferential), and Belle
measured both electron and muon \(B\to K\ell\ell\) modes together with \(R_K\)
(Belle2021:BtoKllLFU). HFLAV now provides current charged and
neutral exclusive-\(K\) branching-fraction averages, while the separate \(R_K\)
updates shifted the clean LFU-anomaly interpretation toward correlated
semileptonic-Wilson-coefficient and hadronic-systematics questions.Validity and model dependence
The HFLAV branching fractions are measured observables and are appropriate for
cataloging, but using them as hard RS cuts is model-dependent. A faithful
constraint must specify the dilepton \(q^2\) regions, charmonium vetoes,
form-factor inputs, nonlocal charm treatment, correlations with \(C_7\) from
\(b\to s\gamma\), and correlations with \(R_K\) and \(B\to K^*\ell\ell\).
The entry is therefore a semileptonic \(\Delta B=1\) constraint seed, not a
drop-in replacement for a global \(b\to s\ell\ell\) fit.
Code coverage in this repo
NO. The modern phenomenology surface lists only
\(\epsilon_K\), \(K\), \(B_d\), \(B_s\), and \(D^0\) systems at
quarkConstraints/modern/phenomenology.py:23. The only live
lepton-flavor module is \(\mu\to e\gamma\), implemented at
flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:75. Required greps over the
implementation directories found no \(B\to K\ell\ell\), \(b\to s\ell\ell\),
\(C_9\), \(C_{10}\), or \(R_K\) backend.
Linked evidence (opens GitHub blob at flavor-catalog-website/2026q2):
- quarkConstraints/modern/phenomenology.py:23 lists only epsilon_K, K, B_d, B_s, and D0 as modern phenomenology systems.
- flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:75 implements check_mu_to_e_gamma; no rare B semileptonic backend is present in flavorConstraints.
- Required greps over quarkConstraints, qcd, flavorConstraints, neutrinos, yukawa, warpConfig, solvers, scanParams, and tests found Delta F = 2 and mu -> e gamma support, but no B -> K ell ell, b -> s ell ell, C9, C10, or R_K implementation.
Implementation difficulty
HIGH. Integration would require a new \(\Delta B=1\) semileptonic
Hamiltonian, matching to \(C_7\), \(C_9\), \(C_{10}\), and primed operators,
\(q^2\)-bin
handling, form factors, nonlocal-charm uncertainties, and experimental
covariance support. The existing \(\Delta F=2\) basis is not enough.
Key references
Process-local snapshots:
HFLAV2025Dec:BplusToKplusll,
HFLAV2025Dec:B0ToK0ll, Belle2021:BtoKllLFU,
LHCb2014:BtoKmumuDifferential,
BaBar2009:BtoKllAsymmetries, and
CsakiFalkowskiWeiler2008:CompositeFlavor.