L010 $\mathcal{B}(\tau^-\to e^-e^+e^-)$

Tau to three electrons charged-lepton-flavor-violating four-lepton decay
Status REVIEWED VERIFIED Medium Code: NO Priority Medium

PDG / equivalent values

Observable Value Year Experiment / source Provenance
Branching fraction upper limit for $\tau^- \to e^-$ e+ $e^-$ 2.7e-8 2025 PDG live tau branching-ratio datablock S035R58, 2025 update source ↑
Branching fraction upper limit for $\tau^- \to e^-$ e+ $e^-$ 2.7e-8 2010 Belle Collaboration source ↑
Branching fraction upper limit for $\tau^- \to e^-$ e+ $e^-$ 2.9e-8 2010 BaBar Collaboration source ↑

Why this constrains the RS scan

This mode tests lepton-sector flavor violation that is not forced to be dipole dominated. Warped lepton extensions can generate \(\tau eee\) through flavor-nonuniversal lepton profiles, KK neutral-gauge exchange, flavor-changing \(Z\) couplings, or scalar exchange. It is therefore complementary to \(\tau\to e\gamma\) and \(\mu\to e\gamma\): an off-shell photon can contribute, but contact four-lepton operators can be the leading effect in models with tree-level lepton-current misalignment.

What's changed since the original paper

Relative to the arXiv:0804.1954 RS-flavor baseline, the direct experimental bound became a B-factory \(10^{-8}\)-level constraint in 2010 (L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.rs\_context; L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.primary\_experiment). Belle set the current PDG-selected limit \(2.7\times10^{-8}\), and BaBar reached the comparable \(2.9\times10^{-8}\) limit (L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.primary\_current\_limit; L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.supporting\_experiment). No newer LHCb electron-mode value is used here: the snapshotted LHCb source is for the all-muon companion mode only (L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.lhcb\_context). For prospects, the Belle II Physics Book quotes \(50~{\rm ab}^{-1}\) sensitivity at the \(\mathcal{O}(10^{-9})\)--\(\mathcal{O}(10^{-10})\) level for favorable low-background tau LFV modes (L010.yaml:pdg\_or\_equivalent.prospects).

Validity and model dependence

Experimentally this is a clean upper limit on a forbidden charged-LFV decay. Its interpretation in the present quark-scan repository is lepton-extension only: there is no tau-sector matching or four-lepton LFV observable in the current scan. As a future RS constraint it is model dependent because dipole-only, contact-operator, and full lepton-EFT assumptions give different correlations with \(\tau\to e\gamma\), \(\tau\to 3\mu\), \(\mu\to e\gamma\), and \(\mu\to 3e\).

Code coverage in this repo

NO. Targeted greps over quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/, neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/, scanParams/, and tests/ found no implementation of \(\tau\to3e\), tau four-lepton LFV, or charged-lepton contact LFV. The adjacent implemented LFV surface is only \(\mu\to e\gamma\): flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:75 and scanParams/scan.py:524. The modern phenomenology registry is limited to neutral-meson systems at quarkConstraints/modern/phenomenology.py:23.

Implementation difficulty

MEDIUM. A first implementation needs a new four-lepton LFV observable and a convention for lepton-flavor Wilson coefficients or RS matching. It does not require lattice inputs or hadronic long-distance calculations, but a production implementation should specify dipole/contact interference and correlations with the existing \(\mu\to e\gamma\) lane.

Reason: A new four-lepton/contact LFV observable and lepton-sector Wilson-coefficient convention are needed. No lattice inputs or hadronic long-distance calculations are required for a first bound.

Key references

Process-local raw keys: PDG2025\_Tau3E, Belle2010\_Tau3Leptons, BaBar2010\_Tau3Leptons, BelleIIPhysicsBook2019\_TauLFV, LHCb2026\_Tau3MuContext, AgasheBlechmanPetriello2006\_RSLFV, and CFW2008\_RSWarpedFlavor.
Source SHAs
7 snapshot(s) tracked in flavor_catalog/processes/charged_lepton/L010.yaml
Access dates
2026-05-16
Worklog
flavor_catalog/worklogs/L010/
LaTeX source
flavor_catalog/processes/charged_lepton/L010.tex
Anchors generated
2026-05-18T01:53:04Z

Branching fraction upper limit for tau^- -> e^- e+ e^-

https://pdglive.lbl.gov/BranchingRatio.action?desig=38&parCode=S035&home=
accessed 2026-05-16 sha 7b5e0e7346d4... snapshot L010/pdg2025_tau3e_pdglive_s035r58.txt RESOLVED
value 2.7e-08
RESOLVED
Match snapshot line 23
L20: violating modes.
L21: 
L22: PDG selected limit:
L23: BR(tau- -> e- e+ e-) < 2.7 x 10^-8, CL = 90%.
L24: Selected data entry: HAYASAKA 2010, Belle, 782 fb^-1 at e+e- center-of-mass
L25: energy 10.6 GeV.
L26: 

Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.

Branching fraction upper limit for tau^- -> e^- e+ e^-

https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.3221
accessed 2026-05-16 sha 073a16f37d0c... snapshot L010/belle2010_tau3leptons_arxiv1001_3221.txt AMBIGUOUS
value 2.7e-08
AMBIGUOUS
Match 1 of 2 snapshot line 29
L26: For tau- -> e- e+ e-, the nominal-selection efficiency is 6.0%, the expected
L27: background is 0.21 +/- 0.15 events, the systematic uncertainty is 9.8%, no
L28: events are observed in the signal region, and
L29: BR(tau- -> e- e+ e-) < 2.7 x 10^-8 at 90% confidence level.
L30: 
L31: Summary extract:
L32: The paper reports BR(tau- -> e- e+ e-) < 2.7 x 10^-8 at 90% CL and says the

Match 2 of 2 snapshot line 32
L29: BR(tau- -> e- e+ e-) < 2.7 x 10^-8 at 90% confidence level.
L30: 
L31: Summary extract:
L32: The paper reports BR(tau- -> e- e+ e-) < 2.7 x 10^-8 at 90% CL and says the
L33: six limits improve previous published limits by factors from 1.3 to 1.6.
L34: 
L35: Use in L010:

Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.

Branching fraction upper limit for tau^- -> e^- e+ e^-

https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.4550
accessed 2026-05-16 sha 1e8f127cfa3e... snapshot L010/babar2010_tau3leptons_arxiv1002_4550.txt RESOLVED
value 2.9e-08
RESOLVED
Match snapshot line 29
L26: For tau- -> e- e+ e-, the efficiency is 8.6 +/- 0.2%, the expected background
L27: is 0.12 +/- 0.02 events, the expected 90% CL branching-fraction upper limit is
L28: 3.4 x 10^-8, zero events are observed, and the observed 90% CL upper limit is
L29: 2.9 x 10^-8.
L30: 
L31: Use in L010:
L32: Independent BaBar cross-check of the B-factory-era tau -> 3e limit; PDG lists

Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.