E007 $d_{Ra}, d_{Xe}$

Radium-225 and xenon-129 electric dipole moments
Status REVIEWED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Low

PDG / equivalent values

Observable Value Year Experiment / source Provenance
Radium-225 atomic electric dipole moment 1.4e-23 e cm 2016 Bishof et al., Phys. Rev. C 94, 025501 (2016); arXiv:1606.04931 source ↑
First Radium-225 atomic electric dipole moment measurement 5e-22 e cm 2015 Parker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 233002 (2015); arXiv:1504.07477 source ↑
Xenon-129 atomic electric dipole moment ? e cm 2019 Sachdeva et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 143003 (2019); arXiv:1909.12800 source ↑
Independent Xenon-129 atomic electric dipole moment measurement ? e cm 2019 Allmendinger et al., Phys. Rev. A 100, 022505 (2019); arXiv:1904.12295 source ↑

Why this constrains the RS scan

Warped anarchic flavor models generically contain new CP phases. Loop matching can generate quark EDMs, chromo-EDMs, the Weinberg three-gluon operator, and semileptonic CP-odd operators. Diamagnetic atoms do not map directly onto one elementary dipole; their dominant hadronic response is usually expressed through nuclear Schiff moments and CP-odd hadronic interactions. \(^{225}\mathrm{Ra}\) is especially useful because octupole deformation enhances Schiff-moment sensitivity, while \(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}\) offers a mature noble-gas co-magnetometer platform with different nuclear and atomic systematics.

What's changed since the original paper

Relative to the 2008 warped-flavor baseline of CsakiFalkowskiWeiler:RSFlavor2008, Ra and Xe EDMs moved from mostly future context into direct experimental inputs. Argonne reported the first \(^{225}\mathrm{Ra}\) EDM measurement in 2015 parker2015\_arxiv1504\_07477.txt and improved it in 2016 by a factor of \(36\) bishof2016\_arxiv1606\_04931.txt. The 2016 Ra paper also records planned upgrades aimed at substantially better statistical reach with controlled systematics bishof2016\_arxiv1606\_04931.txt. The deposited Argonne program page Argonne:Ra225EDMPage states the physical motivation: \(^{225}\mathrm{Ra}\) has experimentally useful nuclear properties and enhanced sensitivity to T-odd, P-odd effects relative to \(^{199}\mathrm{Hg}\). For Xe, the 2019 comagnetometer measurements sachdeva2019\_arxiv1909\_12800.txt and allmendinger2019\_arxiv1904\_12295.txt established \(10^{-27}\ e\,\mathrm{cm}\)-level direct limits. The DFG Heidelberg upgrade proposal DFG:Xe129Upgrade2026 aims to improve the \(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}\) EDM reach. KU Leuven's RaF/AcF molecular project KULeuven:RaFMoleculeProject2023 is not a direct Ra-atom limit, but it is relevant future context because embedding octupole-enhanced Ra or Ac nuclei in dipolar molecules can enhance Schiff-moment sensitivity.

Validity and model dependence

The direct atom-EDM limits are robust null searches for P- and T-violating energy shifts. Their interpretation in an RS pipeline is highly model-dependent: one must choose a CP-odd low-energy operator basis, run and match through QCD thresholds, and adopt hadronic, nuclear, and atomic coefficients. These entries should therefore be treated as EDM-adjacent loop/nuclear-translation probes, not as direct \(\Delta F=2\) quark-scan constraints.

Code coverage in this repo

NO. The sidecar code\_coverage block records the required greps over quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/, neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/, scanParams/, and tests/ found no Ra, Xe, Schiff-moment, diamagnetic-atom, chromo-EDM, or Weinberg-operator implementation. The only nearby dipole code is the off-diagonal \(\mu\to e\gamma\) helper at flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:3, flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:21, and flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:81; that code is not an atomic or hadronic EDM calculation.

Implementation difficulty

HIGH. A live E007 constraint needs new CP-odd quark/gluon and semileptonic matching, RG evolution to hadronic scales, and separate nuclear/atomic response layers for Ra and Xe. The existing SLL/SLR/VLL/VRR/LR \(\Delta F=2\) basis and the \(\mu\to e\gamma\) dipole helper do not cover this observable.

Reason: Requires new CP-odd quark/gluon and semileptonic operator matching, RG evolution through QCD thresholds, and separate nuclear/atomic response models for Ra and Xe Schiff-moment dominated observables. Existing $\Delta F = 2$ and $\mu \to e \gamma$ code paths do not provide this observable.

Key references

Process-local source keys before bibliography consolidation: Bishof:Ra225EDM2016, Parker:Ra225EDM2015, Sachdeva:Xe129EDM2019, Allmendinger:Xe129EDM2019, Argonne:Ra225EDMPage, DFG:Xe129Upgrade2026, KULeuven:RaFMoleculeProject2023, and CsakiFalkowskiWeiler:RSFlavor2008.
Source SHAs
8 snapshot(s) tracked in flavor_catalog/processes/edm_neutrino/E007.yaml
Access dates
2026-05-16
Worklog
flavor_catalog/worklogs/E007/
LaTeX source
flavor_catalog/processes/edm_neutrino/E007.tex
Anchors generated
2026-05-17T21:55:00-04:00

ra225_current_direct_limit

https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04931
accessed 2026-05-16 sha a9042e38b7b3... snapshot E007/bishof2016_arxiv1606_04931.txt AMBIGUOUS
value_summary |d(225Ra)| < 1.4 x 10^-23 e cm at 95% confidence upper limit; factor 36 improvement over the previous result.
AMBIGUOUS
Match 1 of 3 snapshot line 29
L26: <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200" />
L27: <meta property="og:image:height" content="700" />
L28: <meta property="og:image:alt" content="arXiv logo"/>
L29: <meta property="og:description" content="Background: Octupole-deformed nuclei, such as that of $^{225}$Ra, are expected to amplify observable atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) that arise from time-reversal and parity-violating interactions in the nuclear medium. In 2015, we reported the first &#34;proof-of-principle&#34; measurement of the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM. Purpose: This work reports on the first of several experimental upgrades to improve the statistical sensitivity of our $^{225}$Ra EDM measurements by orders of magnitude and evaluates systematic effects that contribute to current and future levels of experimental sensitivity. Method: Laser-cooled and trapped $^{225}$Ra atoms are held between two high voltage electrodes in an ultra high vacuum chamber at the center of a magnetically shielded environment. We observe Larmor precession in a uniform magnetic field using nuclear-spin-dependent laser light scattering and look for a phase shift proportional to the applied electric field, which indicates the existence of an EDM. The main improvement to our measurement technique is an order of magnitude increase in spin precession time, which is enabled by an improved vacuum system and a reduction in trap-induced heating. Results: We have measured the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM to be less than $1.4\times10^{-23}$ $e$ cm (95% confidence upper limit), which is a factor of 36 improvement over our previous result. Conclusions: Our evaluation of systematic effects shows that this measurement is completely limited by statistical uncertainty. Combining this measurement technique with planned experimental upgrades we project a statistical sensitivity at the $1\times10^{-28}$ $e$ cm level and a total systematic uncertainty at the $4\times10^{-29}$ $e$ cm level."/>
L30: <meta name="twitter:site" content="@arxiv"/>
L31: <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"/>
L32: <meta name="twitter:title" content="Improved limit on the $^{225}$Ra electric dipole moment"/>
Match 2 of 3 snapshot line 40
L37:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/js-cookie@2/src/js.cookie.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
L38:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@2.3.5/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
L39:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/toggle-labs.js?20241022" type="text/javascript"></script>
L40:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/cite.js" type="text/javascript"></script><meta name="citation_title" content="Improved limit on the $^{225}$Ra electric dipole moment" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Bishof, Michael" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Parker, Richard H." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Bailey, Kevin G." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Greene, John P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Holt, Roy J." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Kalita, Mukut R." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Korsch, Wolfgang" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Lemke, Nathan D." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Lu, Zheng-Tian" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Mueller, Peter" /><meta name="citation_author" content="O&#39;Connor, Thomas P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Singh, Jaideep T." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Dietrich, Matthew R." /><meta name="citation_doi" content="10.1103/PhysRevC.94.025501" /><meta name="citation_date" content="2016/06/15" /><meta name="citation_online_date" content="2016/06/15" /><meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.04931" /><meta name="citation_arxiv_id" content="1606.04931" /><meta name="citation_abstract" content="Background: Octupole-deformed nuclei, such as that of $^{225}$Ra, are expected to amplify observable atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) that arise from time-reversal and parity-violating interactions in the nuclear medium. In 2015, we reported the first &#34;proof-of-principle&#34; measurement of the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM. Purpose: This work reports on the first of several experimental upgrades to improve the statistical sensitivity of our $^{225}$Ra EDM measurements by orders of magnitude and evaluates systematic effects that contribute to current and future levels of experimental sensitivity. Method: Laser-cooled and trapped $^{225}$Ra atoms are held between two high voltage electrodes in an ultra high vacuum chamber at the center of a magnetically shielded environment. We observe Larmor precession in a uniform magnetic field using nuclear-spin-dependent laser light scattering and look for a phase shift proportional to the applied electric field, which indicates the existence of an EDM. The main improvement to our measurement technique is an order of magnitude increase in spin precession time, which is enabled by an improved vacuum system and a reduction in trap-induced heating. Results: We have measured the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM to be less than $1.4\times10^{-23}$ $e$ cm (95% confidence upper limit), which is a factor of 36 improvement over our previous result. Conclusions: Our evaluation of systematic effects shows that this measurement is completely limited by statistical uncertainty. Combining this measurement technique with planned experimental upgrades we project a statistical sensitivity at the $1\times10^{-28}$ $e$ cm level and a total systematic uncertainty at the $4\times10^{-29}$ $e$ cm level." />
L41: </head>
L42: 
L43: <body  class="with-cu-identity">
Match 3 of 3 snapshot line 180
L177: 
L178: 
L179:     <blockquote class="abstract mathjax">
L180:             <span class="descriptor">Abstract:</span>Background: Octupole-deformed nuclei, such as that of $^{225}$Ra, are expected to amplify observable atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) that arise from time-reversal and parity-violating interactions in the nuclear medium. In 2015, we reported the first &#34;proof-of-principle&#34; measurement of the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM. Purpose: This work reports on the first of several experimental upgrades to improve the statistical sensitivity of our $^{225}$Ra EDM measurements by orders of magnitude and evaluates systematic effects that contribute to current and future levels of experimental sensitivity. Method: Laser-cooled and trapped $^{225}$Ra atoms are held between two high voltage electrodes in an ultra high vacuum chamber at the center of a magnetically shielded environment. We observe Larmor precession in a uniform magnetic field using nuclear-spin-dependent laser light scattering and look for a phase shift proportional to the applied electric field, which indicates the existence of an EDM. The main improvement to our measurement technique is an order of magnitude increase in spin precession time, which is enabled by an improved vacuum system and a reduction in trap-induced heating. Results: We have measured the $^{225}$Ra atomic EDM to be less than $1.4\times10^{-23}$ $e$ cm (95% confidence upper limit), which is a factor of 36 improvement over our previous result. Conclusions: Our evaluation of systematic effects shows that this measurement is completely limited by statistical uncertainty. Combining this measurement technique with planned experimental upgrades we project a statistical sensitivity at the $1\times10^{-28}$ $e$ cm level and a total systematic uncertainty at the $4\times10^{-29}$ $e$ cm level.
L181:     </blockquote>
L182: 
L183:     <!--CONTEXT-->
Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.

ra225_first_measurement

https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.07477
accessed 2026-05-16 sha ff5adb5cdce9... snapshot E007/parker2015_arxiv1504_07477.txt AMBIGUOUS
value_summary |d(225Ra)| < 5.0 x 10^-22 e cm at 95% confidence.
AMBIGUOUS
Match 1 of 3 snapshot line 29
L26: <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200" />
L27: <meta property="og:image:height" content="700" />
L28: <meta property="og:image:alt" content="arXiv logo"/>
L29: <meta property="og:description" content="The radioactive radium-225 ($^{225}$Ra) atom is a favorable case to search for a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM). Due to its strong nuclear octupole deformation and large atomic mass, $^{225}$Ra is particularly sensitive to interactions in the nuclear medium that violate both time-reversal symmetry and parity. We have developed a cold-atom technique to study the spin precession of $^{225}$Ra atoms held in an optical dipole trap, and demonstrated the principle of this method by completing the first measurement of its atomic EDM, reaching an upper limit of $|$$d$($^{225}$Ra)$|$ $&lt;$ $5.0\!\times\!10^{-22}$ $e \cdot$cm (95$\%$ confidence)."/>
L30: <meta name="twitter:site" content="@arxiv"/>
L31: <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"/>
L32: <meta name="twitter:title" content="First Measurement of the Atomic Electric Dipole Moment of $^{225}$Ra"/>
Match 2 of 3 snapshot line 40
L37:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/js-cookie@2/src/js.cookie.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
L38:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@2.3.5/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
L39:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/toggle-labs.js?20241022" type="text/javascript"></script>
L40:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/cite.js" type="text/javascript"></script><meta name="citation_title" content="First Measurement of the Atomic Electric Dipole Moment of $^{225}$Ra" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Parker, R. H." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Dietrich, M. R." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Kalita, M. R." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Lemke, N. D." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Bailey, K. G." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Bishof, M. N." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Greene, J. P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Holt, R. J." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Korsch, W." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Lu, Z. -T." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Mueller, P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="O&#39;Connor, T. P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Singh, J. T." /><meta name="citation_date" content="2015/04/28" /><meta name="citation_online_date" content="2015/04/29" /><meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.07477" /><meta name="citation_arxiv_id" content="1504.07477" /><meta name="citation_abstract" content="The radioactive radium-225 ($^{225}$Ra) atom is a favorable case to search for a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM). Due to its strong nuclear octupole deformation and large atomic mass, $^{225}$Ra is particularly sensitive to interactions in the nuclear medium that violate both time-reversal symmetry and parity. We have developed a cold-atom technique to study the spin precession of $^{225}$Ra atoms held in an optical dipole trap, and demonstrated the principle of this method by completing the first measurement of its atomic EDM, reaching an upper limit of $|$$d$($^{225}$Ra)$|$ $&lt;$ $5.0\!\times\!10^{-22}$ $e \cdot$cm (95$\%$ confidence)." />
L41: </head>
L42: 
L43: <body  class="with-cu-identity">
Match 3 of 3 snapshot line 180
L177: 
L178: 
L179:     <blockquote class="abstract mathjax">
L180:             <span class="descriptor">Abstract:</span>The radioactive radium-225 ($^{225}$Ra) atom is a favorable case to search for a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM). Due to its strong nuclear octupole deformation and large atomic mass, $^{225}$Ra is particularly sensitive to interactions in the nuclear medium that violate both time-reversal symmetry and parity. We have developed a cold-atom technique to study the spin precession of $^{225}$Ra atoms held in an optical dipole trap, and demonstrated the principle of this method by completing the first measurement of its atomic EDM, reaching an upper limit of $|$$d$($^{225}$Ra)$|$ $&lt;$ $5.0\!\times\!10^{-22}$ $e \cdot$cm (95$\%$ confidence).
L181:     </blockquote>
L182: 
L183:     <!--CONTEXT-->
Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.

xe129_best_direct_limit

https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12800
accessed 2026-05-16 sha abce59966ada... snapshot E007/sachdeva2019_arxiv1909_12800.txt AMBIGUOUS
value_summary d_A(129Xe) = (1.4 +/- 6.6_stat +/- 2.0_syst) x 10^-28 e cm; |d_A(129Xe)| < 1.4 x 10^-27 e cm at 95% CL; factor five more sensitive than 2001.
AMBIGUOUS
Match 1 of 3 snapshot line 29
L26: <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200" />
L27: <meta property="og:image:height" content="700" />
L28: <meta property="og:image:alt" content="arXiv logo"/>
L29: <meta property="og:description" content="We report results of a new technique to measure the electric dipole moment of $^{129}$Xe with $^3$He comagnetometry. Both species are polarized using spin-exchange optical pumping, transferred to a measurement cell, and transported into a magnetically shielded room, where SQUID magnetometers detect free precession in applied electric and magnetic fields. The result from a one week measurement campaign in 2017 and a 2.5 week campaign in 2018, combined with detailed study of systematic effects, is $d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = (1.4 \pm 6.6_\mathrm{stat} \pm 2.0_\mathrm{syst})\times10^{-28}~e\,\mathrm{cm}$. This corresponds to an upper limit of $|d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe})| &lt; 1.4 \times 10^{-27} ~e\,\mathrm{cm}~(95\%~\mathrm{CL})$, a factor of five more sensitive than the limit set in 2001."/>
L30: <meta name="twitter:site" content="@arxiv"/>
L31: <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"/>
L32: <meta name="twitter:title" content="New Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of $^{129}$Xe..."/>
Match 2 of 3 snapshot line 40
L37:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/js-cookie@2/src/js.cookie.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
L38:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@2.3.5/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
L39:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/toggle-labs.js?20241022" type="text/javascript"></script>
L40:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/cite.js" type="text/javascript"></script><meta name="citation_title" content="New Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of $^{129}$Xe using $^{3}$He Comagnetometry and SQUID Detection" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Sachdeva, N." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Fan, I." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Babcock, E." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Burghoff, M." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Chupp, T. E." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Degenkolb, S." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Fierlinger, P." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Haude, S." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Kraegeloh, E." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Kilian, W." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Knappe-Grüneberg, S." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Kuchler, F." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Liu, T." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Marino, M." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Meinel, J." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Rolfs, K." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Salhi, Z." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Schnabel, A." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Singh, J. T." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Stuiber, S." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Terrano, W. A." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Trahms, L." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Voigt, J." /><meta name="citation_doi" content="10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.143003" /><meta name="citation_date" content="2019/09/26" /><meta name="citation_online_date" content="2019/09/26" /><meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.12800" /><meta name="citation_arxiv_id" content="1909.12800" /><meta name="citation_abstract" content="We report results of a new technique to measure the electric dipole moment of $^{129}$Xe with $^3$He comagnetometry. Both species are polarized using spin-exchange optical pumping, transferred to a measurement cell, and transported into a magnetically shielded room, where SQUID magnetometers detect free precession in applied electric and magnetic fields. The result from a one week measurement campaign in 2017 and a 2.5 week campaign in 2018, combined with detailed study of systematic effects, is $d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = (1.4 \pm 6.6_\mathrm{stat} \pm 2.0_\mathrm{syst})\times10^{-28}~e\,\mathrm{cm}$. This corresponds to an upper limit of $|d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe})| &lt; 1.4 \times 10^{-27} ~e\,\mathrm{cm}~(95\%~\mathrm{CL})$, a factor of five more sensitive than the limit set in 2001." />
L41: </head>
L42: 
L43: <body  class="with-cu-identity">
Match 3 of 3 snapshot line 180
L177: 
L178: 
L179:     <blockquote class="abstract mathjax">
L180:             <span class="descriptor">Abstract:</span>We report results of a new technique to measure the electric dipole moment of $^{129}$Xe with $^3$He comagnetometry. Both species are polarized using spin-exchange optical pumping, transferred to a measurement cell, and transported into a magnetically shielded room, where SQUID magnetometers detect free precession in applied electric and magnetic fields. The result from a one week measurement campaign in 2017 and a 2.5 week campaign in 2018, combined with detailed study of systematic effects, is $d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe}) = (1.4 \pm 6.6_\mathrm{stat} \pm 2.0_\mathrm{syst})\times10^{-28}~e\,\mathrm{cm}$. This corresponds to an upper limit of $|d_A(^{129}\mathrm{Xe})| &lt; 1.4 \times 10^{-27} ~e\,\mathrm{cm}~(95\%~\mathrm{CL})$, a factor of five more sensitive than the limit set in 2001.
L181:     </blockquote>
L182: 
L183:     <!--CONTEXT-->
Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.

xe129_independent_heidelberg_limit

https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12295
accessed 2026-05-16 sha 94e4abc0ed9f... snapshot E007/allmendinger2019_arxiv1904_12295.txt AMBIGUOUS
value_summary d_Xe = (-4.7 +/- 6.4) x 10^-28 e cm; |d_Xe| < 1.5 x 10^-27 e cm at 95% C.L.
AMBIGUOUS
Match 1 of 3 snapshot line 29
L26: <meta property="og:image:width" content="1200" />
L27: <meta property="og:image:height" content="700" />
L28: <meta property="og:image:alt" content="arXiv logo"/>
L29: <meta property="og:description" content="We report on a new measurement of the CP-violating permanent Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) of the neutral $^{129}$Xe atom. Our experimental approach is based on the detection of the free precession of co-located nuclear spin-polarized $^3$He and $^{129}$Xe samples. The EDM measurement sensitivity benefits strongly from long spin coherence times of several hours achieved in diluted gases and homogeneous weak magnetic fields of about 400~nT. A finite EDM is indicated by a change in the precession frequency, as an electric field is periodically reversed with respect to the magnetic guiding field. Our result, $\left(-4.7\pm6.4\right)\cdot 10^{-28}$ ecm, is consistent with zero and is used to place a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe EDM: $|d_\text{Xe}|&lt;1.5 \cdot 10^{-27}$ ecm (95% C.L.). We also discuss the implications of this result for various CP-violating observables as they relate to theories of physics beyond the standard model."/>
L30: <meta name="twitter:site" content="@arxiv"/>
L31: <meta name="twitter:card" content="summary"/>
L32: <meta name="twitter:title" content="Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the $^{129}$Xe Atom"/>
Match 2 of 3 snapshot line 40
L37:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/js-cookie@2/src/js.cookie.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
L38:   <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@2.3.5/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
L39:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/toggle-labs.js?20241022" type="text/javascript"></script>
L40:   <script src="/static/browse/0.3.4/js/cite.js" type="text/javascript"></script><meta name="citation_title" content="Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the $^{129}$Xe Atom" /><meta name="citation_author" content="Allmendinger, F." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Engin, I." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Heil, W." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Karpuk, S." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Krause, H. -J." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Niederländer, B." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Offenhäusser, A." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Repetto, M." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Schmidt, U." /><meta name="citation_author" content="Zimmer, S." /><meta name="citation_doi" content="10.1103/PhysRevA.100.022505" /><meta name="citation_date" content="2019/04/28" /><meta name="citation_online_date" content="2019/08/12" /><meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.12295" /><meta name="citation_arxiv_id" content="1904.12295" /><meta name="citation_abstract" content="We report on a new measurement of the CP-violating permanent Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) of the neutral $^{129}$Xe atom. Our experimental approach is based on the detection of the free precession of co-located nuclear spin-polarized $^3$He and $^{129}$Xe samples. The EDM measurement sensitivity benefits strongly from long spin coherence times of several hours achieved in diluted gases and homogeneous weak magnetic fields of about 400~nT. A finite EDM is indicated by a change in the precession frequency, as an electric field is periodically reversed with respect to the magnetic guiding field. Our result, $\left(-4.7\pm6.4\right)\cdot 10^{-28}$ ecm, is consistent with zero and is used to place a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe EDM: $|d_\text{Xe}|&lt;1.5 \cdot 10^{-27}$ ecm (95% C.L.). We also discuss the implications of this result for various CP-violating observables as they relate to theories of physics beyond the standard model." />
L41: </head>
L42: 
L43: <body  class="with-cu-identity">
Match 3 of 3 snapshot line 180
L177: 
L178: 
L179:     <blockquote class="abstract mathjax">
L180:             <span class="descriptor">Abstract:</span>We report on a new measurement of the CP-violating permanent Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) of the neutral $^{129}$Xe atom. Our experimental approach is based on the detection of the free precession of co-located nuclear spin-polarized $^3$He and $^{129}$Xe samples. The EDM measurement sensitivity benefits strongly from long spin coherence times of several hours achieved in diluted gases and homogeneous weak magnetic fields of about 400~nT. A finite EDM is indicated by a change in the precession frequency, as an electric field is periodically reversed with respect to the magnetic guiding field. Our result, $\left(-4.7\pm6.4\right)\cdot 10^{-28}$ ecm, is consistent with zero and is used to place a new upper limit on the $^{129}$Xe EDM: $|d_\text{Xe}|&lt;1.5 \cdot 10^{-27}$ ecm (95% C.L.). We also discuss the implications of this result for various CP-violating observables as they relate to theories of physics beyond the standard model.
L181:     </blockquote>
L182: 
L183:     <!--CONTEXT-->
Snapshots live under flavor_catalog/references/<process_id>/. Source-line anchoring is automated; the status pill reflects match confidence, not editorial review.