E006 $d_{Hg}$
Mercury-199 electric dipole moment Status SUBTLETY-ADDED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Medium
PDG / equivalent values
| Observable | Value | Year | Experiment / source | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury-199 atomic electric dipole moment | 7.4e-30 e cm | 2016 | Graner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161601 (2016); arXiv:1601.04339 | source ↑ |
| Improvement of the 199Hg EDM bound relative to the previous limit | 4 dimensionless improvement factor | 2016 | Graner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161601 (2016); arXiv:1601.04339 | source ↑ |
| Theory-derived neutron EDM rows using 199Hg atom EDM | ? | 2026 | PDG Live 2026 S017EDM neutron electric dipole moment datablock | source ↑ |
| Selected interpretation-level limits derived from 199Hg | ? | 2017 | Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 013002 (2017); arXiv:1612.09371 | source ↑ |
Why this constrains the RS scan
Warped or composite anarchic flavor models generically contain new CP phases.
Loop matching can generate quark EDMs, quark chromo-EDMs, the Weinberg
three-gluon operator, and semileptonic CP-odd operators. In a diamagnetic
closed-shell atom such as \(^{199}\mathrm{Hg}\), the dominant hadronic
sensitivity is usually phrased through the nuclear Schiff moment and
CP-odd pion-nucleon interactions, rather than through a simple elementary
fermion EDM. The observable is therefore complementary to the neutron EDM:
it probes a different linear combination of CP-odd low-energy operators and
nuclear matrix elements.
What's changed since the original paper
Relative to the 2008 CFW warped-flavor baseline
(
CsakiFalkowskiWeiler:RSFlavor2008), the main experimental update is
the 2016 Washington \(^{199}\mathrm{Hg}\) measurement
(Graner:HgEDM2016), which improved the previous Hg bound by a factor
of \(4\) and remains the standard diamagnetic-atom benchmark. The post-2008
theory update represented here by Sahoo 2017
(Sahoo:HgEDMTheory2017) combines the Hg atom limit with relativistic
atomic calculations and quotes derived limits including
\(d_n<2.2\times10^{-26}\ |e|\,\mathrm{cm}\),
\(d_p<2.1\times10^{-25}\ |e|\,\mathrm{cm}\),
\(|\bar\theta|<1.1\times10^{-10}\), and
\(|\tilde d_u-\tilde d_d|<5.5\times10^{-27}\ |e|\,\mathrm{cm}\)
(Sahoo:HgEDMTheory2017).Validity and model dependence
The experimental atom-EDM bound is robust as a null search for a
\(P\)- and \(T\)-violating energy shift. Translating it into RS parameters is
model-dependent: the result depends on the chosen CP-odd operator basis,
QCD running and thresholds, atomic many-body coefficients, nuclear Schiff
moments, hadronic matrix elements, and possible cancellations among sources.
It should be treated as an EDM-adjacent loop/nuclear-translation constraint,
not as a direct \(\Delta F=2\) bound in the current quark scan.
For anarchic CP phases, EDM constraints should be reviewed jointly with the
flavor branching rows that share the same Wilson coefficients (relevant
cross-refs: K001, K003, B011, B033, B034), not as an isolated appendix.
Code coverage in this repo
NO. The required catalog greps and a focused search for
Hg, mercury, 199Hg, d\_Hg,
Schiff, diamagnetic, chromo-EDM,
Weinberg, and generic EDM/dipole terms over
quarkConstraints/, qcd/, flavorConstraints/,
neutrinos/, yukawa/, warpConfig/,
solvers/, scanParams/, and tests/ found no
\(^{199}\mathrm{Hg}\) EDM implementation. The only nearby dipole code is the
off-diagonal \(\mu\to e\gamma\) helper in
flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:3, :21, and :81.Implementation difficulty
HIGH. A live constraint would require new CP-odd quark/gluon and
semileptonic operator matching, RG running to hadronic scales, and an
atomic/nuclear translation layer for \(^{199}\mathrm{Hg}\). The existing
SLL/SLR/VLL/VRR/LR \(\Delta F=2\) basis and the \(\mu\to e\gamma\) NDA helper
do not cover this observable.
Reason: Requires new CP-odd quark/gluon and semileptonic operator matching, QCD running and thresholds, and atomic/nuclear translation for the 199Hg Schiff-moment dominated response. Existing $\Delta F = 2$ and $\mu \to e \gamma$ code paths do not provide this observable.
Key references
Process-local source keys before bibliography consolidation:
Graner:HgEDM2016, PDG2026:NeutronEDMHgCrossref,
Sahoo:HgEDMTheory2017, and
CsakiFalkowskiWeiler:RSFlavor2008.