B013 $B_s^0\to\phi(1020)\gamma$
Exclusive radiative $B_s$ decay via b $ \to $ s $\gamma$ Status REVIEWED VERIFIED High Code: NO Priority Low
PDG / equivalent values
| Observable | Value | Year | Experiment / source | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $B(B_s0 \to \phi(1020$) $\gamma$) | (3.4 +/- 0.4) x 10^-5 | 2025 | PDG B_s0 listing, 2025 update | source ↑ |
| $B(B_s0 \to \phi(1020$) $\gamma$) | (34.0 +/- 3.2) x 10^-6 | 2024 | HFLAV rare decays, end-of-year 2024 | source ↑ |
| $S_\phi \gamma$ in $B_s0 \to \phi \gamma$ | 0.43 +/- 0.30(stat) +/- 0.11(syst) | 2019 | LHCb arXiv:1905.06284; also listed in PDG 2025 | source ↑ |
| $C_\phi \gamma$ in $B_s0 \to \phi \gamma$ | 0.11 +/- 0.29(stat) +/- 0.11(syst) | 2019 | LHCb arXiv:1905.06284; also listed in PDG 2025 | source ↑ |
| $A_\Delta_\phi \gamma$ in $B_s0 \to \phi \gamma$ | -0.67 +0.37 -0.41(stat) +/- 0.17(syst) | 2019 | LHCb arXiv:1905.06284; also listed in PDG 2025 | source ↑ |
| $B(B_s0 \to \phi \gamma$), Belle $\Upsilon(5S$) input | (3.6 +/- 0.5(stat) +/- 0.3(syst) +/- 0.6(f_s)) x 10^-5 | 2014 | Belle arXiv:1411.7771 | source ↑ |
| overall tensor contribution $F_{f2}$ in $B_s0 \to $ K+K- $\gamma$ | 16.8 +/- 0.5(stat) +/- 0.7(syst)% | 2024 | LHCb arXiv:2406.00235 | source ↑ |
| $B(B_s0 \to $ f2'(1525) $\gamma$) / $B(B_s0 \to \phi \gamma$), preferred solution | 19.4 +0.9 -0.8(stat) +1.4 -0.5(syst) +/- 0.5(B)% | 2024 | LHCb arXiv:2406.00235 | source ↑ |
| $A_T^(2$) in $B_s0 \to \phi$ e+e-, very-low-q2 photon-polarisation proxy | -0.045 +/- 0.235(stat) +/- 0.014(syst) | 2024 | LHCb arXiv:2411.10219 | source ↑ |
| $A_T^{ImCP}$ in $B_s0 \to \phi$ e+e-, very-low-q2 photon-polarisation proxy | 0.002 +/- 0.247(stat) +/- 0.016(syst) | 2024 | LHCb arXiv:2411.10219 | source ↑ |
| longitudinal polarisation fraction $F_L(\phi$) in $B_s0 \to \phi$ e+e- | < 11.5% at 90% CL 90% CL (upper limit) | 2024 | LHCb arXiv:2411.10219 | source ↑ |
Why this constrains the RS scan
This this catalog wave entry is SECONDARY under
flavor\_catalog/PRIORITY\_TIERS.md. The physics motivation is direct:
\(B_s^0\to\phi\gamma\) probes the electromagnetic dipole transition
\(b\to s\gamma\), but with a helicity handle that the inclusive
\(B\to X_s\gamma\) rate does not provide. In anarchic RS or composite-Higgs
variants, KK fermions, KK gauge bosons, and the Higgs sector can generate
chirality-flipped dipole coefficients \(C_7'\) and \(C_8'\). Those
contributions may leave the inclusive rate close to the SM while shifting
\(A^\Delta_{\phi\gamma}\) or \(S_{\phi\gamma}\), so this mode is a useful
companion to B011 and B012.What's changed since the original paper
Muheim--Xie--Zwicky, arXiv:0802.0876, set the pre-LHC formalism by showing how
the \(B_s\) width difference exposes the time-dependent
\(\sinh(\Delta\Gamma_s t/2)\) coefficient and therefore the right-handed photon
amplitude. Belle measured \(B_s^0\to\phi\gamma\) at the \(\Upsilon(5S)\) in
arXiv:1411.7771, contributing one input to the modern PDG/HFLAV
branching-fraction average. LHCb's arXiv:1905.06284 analysis is the current
time-dependent CP reference: it gives the first \(S_{\phi\gamma}\) and
\(C_{\phi\gamma}\) measurements in a radiative \(B_s\) decay and updates the
earlier untagged \(A^\Delta_{\phi\gamma}\) result. LHCb arXiv:2406.00235 added
a Run-1/Run-2 amplitude analysis of \(B_s^0\to K^+K^-\gamma\), clarifying the
resonant composition around the \(\phi(1020)\), while arXiv:2411.10219 uses the
very-low-\(q^2\) \(B_s^0\to\phi e^+e^-\) angular distribution as a virtual
photon-polarization cross-check.
Validity and model dependence
The branching fraction is experimentally established, but an exclusive
constraint needs form-factor and spectator-amplitude conventions rather than
only the inclusive \(C_7\) rate machinery. The time-dependent observables are
cleaner chirality probes, yet their use in a scan still requires a consistent
mapping from RS dipole coefficients to \(C_7,C_7'\) and \(C_8,C_8'\), the
\(B_s\)-mixing phase and width-difference conventions, and an exclusive
\(B_s\to\phi\) amplitude model. A catalog entry is therefore robust, while a
hard likelihood is model-dependent until the dipole and exclusive-amplitude
pipeline exists.
Code coverage in this repo
NO. The required greps over
quarkConstraints/,
qcd/, flavorConstraints/, neutrinos/,
yukawa/, warpConfig/, solvers/,
scanParams/, and tests/ found no implementation of
\(B_s^0\to\phi\gamma\), \(S_{\phi\gamma}\), \(A^\Delta_{\phi\gamma}\), or a
quark-sector \(b\to s\gamma\) dipole likelihood. The existing modern quark
surface enumerates only \(\epsilon_K\), \(K\), \(B_d\), \(B_s\), and \(D^0\)
neutral-meson mixing at quarkConstraints/modern/phenomenology.py:23;
the \(\Delta F=2\) beauty entry points at
quarkConstraints/deltaf2.py:903 and
quarkConstraints/deltaf2.py:922 are mixing observables, not radiative
decays. The dipole hit at flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:75 is the
unrelated charged-lepton \(\mu\to e\gamma\) check.
Linked evidence (opens GitHub blob at flavor-catalog-website/2026q2):
- Focused B013 grep for B_s -> phi gamma, S_phi, A_Delta, b->s gamma dipoles, C7/C7', and photon-polarization terms returned exit=1 with no implementation hits.
- quarkConstraints/modern/phenomenology.py:23 enumerates the modern quark surface as epsilon_K, K, B_d, B_s, and D0 neutral-meson mixing systems.
- quarkConstraints/deltaf2.py:903 and quarkConstraints/deltaf2.py:922 implement B_d and B_s mixing evaluators, not radiative b -> s gamma decays.
- flavorConstraints/muToEGamma.py:75 defines check_mu_to_e_gamma, an unrelated lepton-sector dipole check.
Implementation difficulty
HIGH. Production use needs new \(b\to s\gamma\) dipole matching,
QCD running for \(C_7,C_7'\) and \(C_8,C_8'\), exclusive \(B_s\to\phi\)
form-factor and resonance inputs, and a time-dependent \(B_s\) likelihood.
The current \(\Delta F=2\) code does not supply that operator basis or
observable layer.
Reason: Requires new $b \to s \gamma$ dipole matching and RG, exclusive $B_s \to \phi$ form-factor/resonance inputs, and a B_s time-dependent CP/helicity likelihood; current $\Delta F = 2$ code and lepton-dipole code do not implement this observable.
Key references
Process-local keys before bibliography consolidation:
PDG2025\_Bs\_phi\_gamma,
HFLAV2024\_rare\_decays\_Bs\_phi\_gamma,
LHCb2019\_Bs\_phi\_gamma\_CP,
Belle2014\_Bs\_phi\_gamma,
LHCb2024\_Bs\_KK\_gamma,
LHCb2024\_Bs\_phi\_ee\_photon\_polarisation,
MuheimXieZwicky2008\_Bs\_phi\_gamma, and
CFW2008\_RS\_flavor.